Sensor
Presented are times and memory-consumption for the Sensor-program. The
speedup is given wrt. the user-time.
I extrapolated the results from the smaller runs on the E6000 to give some
virtual numbers on the largest benchmark, which can be used to compute a speedup
for the other systems. These numbers are presented in italic with a light-gray
background.
An overview of the results is given at the and of this page.
Sun E6000
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
52.6 |
0.5 |
53.0 |
1.0 |
50 |
| 10 |
219.7 |
2.0 |
221.7 |
1.0 |
195 |
| 11 |
884.2 |
8.1 |
892.3 |
1.0 |
773 |
| 12 |
3579.8 |
31.6 |
3611.5 |
1.0 |
3081 |
| 13 |
15116.6 |
131.7 |
15248.6 |
1.0 |
12305 |
| 14 |
63833.6 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
49220 |
Sun SunFire 6800
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
13.7 |
0.1 |
13.8 |
3.82 |
76 |
| 10 |
59.8 |
0.5 |
60.3 |
3.66 |
221 |
| 11 |
269.2 |
2.0 |
271.1 |
3.26 |
799 |
| 12 |
1023.7 |
7.8 |
1031.5 |
3.50 |
3107 |
| 13 |
4194.1 |
32.2 |
4226.5 |
3.60 |
12332 |
| 14 |
17942.4 |
141.4 |
18083.7 |
3.56 |
49213 |
Sun SunFire 15k
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
14.1 |
0.1 |
14.2 |
3.72 |
76 |
| 10 |
61.2 |
0.6 |
62.2 |
3.55 |
221 |
| 11 |
260.2 |
2.2 |
262.3 |
3.38 |
799 |
| 12 |
1060.9 |
8.7 |
1069.6 |
3.37 |
3107 |
| 13 |
4326.8 |
34.8 |
4361.5 |
3.49 |
12332 |
| 14 |
24149.2 |
170.4 |
24318.7 |
2.64 |
49213 |
HP 9000 Superdome
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
8.3 |
0.2 |
8.5 |
6.28 |
- |
| 10 |
30.5 |
0.8 |
31.2 |
7.18 |
- |
| 11 |
114.8 |
3.0 |
117.7 |
7.65 |
- |
| 12 |
467.7 |
12.0 |
479.4 |
7.65 |
- |
| 13 |
3378.6 |
47.2 |
3423.8 |
4.47 |
- |
| 14 |
19344.9 |
190.6 |
19523.7 |
3.27 |
48030 |
-
Going from level 12 to level 13 one can see a factor of 7.3 in the computing
time, but it should grow by a factor of 4. A similar observation can be made
when going from level 13 to level 14. As told by HP, we have a large increase
of TLB-misses at these levels.
|
|
IBM eServer p690
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
5.0 |
0.1 |
5.1 |
10.51 |
- |
| 10 |
20.5 |
0.4 |
36.1 |
10.70 |
- |
| 11 |
81.8 |
1.6 |
83.4 |
10.73 |
- |
| 12 |
372.4 |
6.3 |
369.3 |
9.61 |
- |
| 13 |
1472.5 |
26.1 |
1530.8 |
10.27 |
- |
| 14 |
6591.4 |
110.2 |
6657.9 |
9.68 |
- |
AMD Athlon MP 2000
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
6.7 |
0.1 |
6.8 |
7.85 |
- |
| 10 |
27.2 |
0.2 |
27.4 |
8.03 |
- |
| 11 |
279.3 |
1.4 |
280.7 |
3.14 |
- |
Dell Xeon 2400
| level |
user-time |
sys-time |
real-time |
speedup |
memory |
| 9 |
6.2 |
0.1 |
6.4 |
8.48 |
- |
| 10 |
24.6 |
0.4 |
25.5 |
8.98 |
- |
| 11 |
115.5 |
1.9 |
120.2 |
7.66 |
- |
The following table shows the speedup of the systems compared to the Sun
E6000. Written with a red color is the fastest system on each level.
| level |
SF6800 |
SF15k |
HP9000 |
P690 |
Athlon |
| 9 |
3.82 |
3.72 |
6.28 |
10.51 |
7.85 |
| 10 |
3.66 |
3.55 |
7.18 |
10.70 |
8.03 |
| 11 |
3.26 |
3.38 |
7.65 |
10.73 |
3.14 |
| 12 |
3.50 |
3.37 |
7.65 |
9.61 |
- |
| 13 |
3.60 |
3.49 |
4.47 |
10.27 |
- |
| 14 |
3.56 |
2.64 |
3.27 |
9.68 |
- |